Category Archives: Features

Johnny Be Good

Condom machine in library hit despite stiff competition catching up from behind…

A condom machine in the Vatican. We shit you not.

With SHAG week approaching an end for another year, The Buzz Kill explores a different angle.

The introduction of a condom machine on the ground floor toilets of the University library certainly raised a few eyebrows, among other things.

As if being Catholic wasn’t embarrassing enough at the moment, now you can’t even have a cry in the toilets over your denomination without facing up to the harsh reality.

The only exception to this of course is if you are a male sex worker, as outlined in the Catholic Church’s Great Fudge of 2010 (forgive the expression).

With student fees spiralling this may become a viable, if salubrious, option – if only for the fact that the Buzz Kill’s news staff are so ugly they could barely give it away, let alone sell it.

Nevertheless, the principal question remains; why? To answer this, we tried to contact a university librarian, who looked askance and said: “…

Nothing. Well not exactly nothing, it was more like a series of false starts. In hindsight, going up to her with a microphone in one hand and a packet of ‘El Gigante’ in the other was not the subtlest option.

And besides, given that it took our man four attempts to even try to question the attractive female librarian about condoms (granted he’s ugly but he’s got confidence), will this help nerds in the grand scheme of things? It’s unlikely.

Yet there is a strenuously legitimate reason. A lot of pubs in Coventry don’t do condoms in the machines anymore; just that ‘little blue pill’ and varying species of inflatable animal.

A brief history of the shaft balloon….

No, this isn't Casper's unfortunately misshaped brother

To that end, condoms are more widely available than they used to be. Traditionally, only very masculine places sold them, such as barbers. It is from the conjecture between barber and customer that the well-known phrase “something for the weekend, sir?” derives.

This implies however that in the 1950s and 1960s the great British public only had sex once a month or so when the husband went to the barbers, and on a Saturday night – which as any red blooded man will tell you conflicted with the introduction of Match of the Day in 1964.

Or protected sex, anyway – no wonder there was such a baby boom back then.

This raised the question of how contraception worked before the condom was around. After rudimentary research, the answer appeared to be through a forceful kick in the stomach, since the condom was on the market before the wire coat hanger. (1855 > 1869, fact fans)

A little known fact regarding condoms can be linked to the etymology of the word ‘scumbag’, which now means a person of ill repute, but was originally a word to describe a condom.

The original derivation has long since been discontinued, but by the state of the youths frequently appearing on The Jeremy Kyle Show, the Buzz Kill would like very much to see it make a comeback.

Now, of course, it is different; but who on earth would feel comfortable with putting a pack of condoms in their trolley while doing the weekly shop, despite how much cheaper it is? It was bad enough asking for them in chemists, for pity’s sake.

But still, visit a lot of pubs in Coventry and you will find machines of perverse, degrading sexual depravity – or toilets as they’re known to anyone who wasn’t a former singer of Wham.

Good old fashioned condom machines however remain a rare sight in men’s toilets amid the inch of piss on the floor, the hand dryer which is colder than Valhalla and that 10p in one of the urinals which you’re always tempted to fish for.

Our editorial stance has always been and will remain that, if it takes several ounces of plastic and a foot pump to get you going, then the very best of luck to you: however, this particular machine could be a vital solution for those who are too shy, too ignorant, or too drunk to find condoms of their own.


Extended Feature: The Story Of The Coventry Lottery

The Source, Coventry’s favourite student paper in a competition of one, reported in their latest issue that the Euro Millions lottery ticket was yet to be claimed.

Source, pg 4, Nov 2010

Bearing in mind that the copy deadline for this edition was in late October, the article would have been topical – but not in late November, when the paper was actually released.

Indeed, the question that had been on several people’s lips – who’d gotten the massive jackpot? – was finally answered late in October.

The Buzz Kill looks back on the story that shook the city of Coventry to a level unheard of…since the Mary Bale fiasco, anyway.

A Killing in Winnings – the Coventry EuroMillions Mystery

It transpired at the end of October that a syndicate of four was successfully awarded the top prize, as a result of being the only people left in the city NOT to blag their way to the jackpot.

Incredibly, reports surfaced that over 1,000 people had attempted to claim the prize.

For anyone whose parents are rich bastards, this is what a lottery stand looks like.

The Buzz-Kill can guarantee that in at least 995 of these cases, the following scenario occurred:

“Hello, I’d like to claim my £113 million prize as I’ve just won the Euromillions jackpot.”

“Certainly, may I see your ticket for confirmation, and then we’ll ring Camelot to iron out the formalities.”

“Erm…I’m meant to have the ticket on me to claim the prize?”

Never has a group of people searched frantically for one set of numbers since they published the BNP’s members list on the Internet.

However, as the Daily Mail reported, in one case a pensioner insisted that her ticket matched the winning numbers, claiming that she gave her husband the ticket for safe-keeping, only for him to bin it.

Convenient that, isn’t it? Like people who put the wrong ticket into the automated train barriers and get angry as the machine breaks down causing every other passenger to be late, they don’t deserve their reward because of being a stupid twat.

The Buzz-Kill thinks such policy ought to become law in the near future.

They don't like it up 'em

Regardless, the press whipped the nation into a fair old panic alright.

The draw was made on October 8, and for the first few days talk was kept low with the media, Camelot and the shop owner expecting the winner to soon come forward. Maybe they were on holiday, or hadn’t bought a calendar this year.

A week later on October 16, the Mirror reported that the winning ticket had been bought in the Coventry area, after some joker from Sunderland had tried to claim the prize first.

Two days later, the Daily Mail got into a spot of bother after describing the Spar store in which the winning ticket was bought as being “on a rundown, slightly shabby parade of shops…flanked by a Lloyds TSB bank and an Indian takeaway.”

When asked for comment, the Daventry Road branch of Lloyds disassociated itself from such a rag, while the Indian takeaway was just happy for the publicity.

However, when our man told the Lloyds manager that it was in relation to a potential customer winning over £100m, his demeanour subtly changed.

October 19 saw the Daily Telegraph ask “Could £113m lottery winner be Coventry pensioner?” causing old biddies across the region to choke on their cereal.

But a day later, they were to be disappointed, as news came through that a Coventry University student had won the prize.

The Coventry Telegraph in their report on October 20 stated that “new rumours…have suggested a Coventry student could have won the cash.”

Yet for anticipatory students, the joy was to only last three lines as the University, in keeping with its traditional good news policy, dismissed the suggestions as “hogwash.”

Pictured: typical students on a night out

Coventry University students were understandably disappointed. Imagine what a care-free undergraduate could do with £113 million pounds? Buy dozens of Ferraris, take a trip around the world…and as of next year, go two thirds of the way to paying off their tuition fees.

In honesty, it’s a good time to be a newshound in Coventry at present. With the football team’s success  and ‘the Mary Bale fiasco’ (if that’s not a name for an 80s electro-pop band we don’t know what is), it seems that Cov is at the epicentre of some weird and wonderful stories.

But imagine if animal rights attacker Bale had claimed the ticket?

Not only would it have caused the story of the century, it would have also caused hundreds of RSPCA supporters to slit their wrists at the injustice of it all.

Yet on October 21, the prize was claimed and everyone went back to work in a tirade of misery, with further reports on October 23 confirming the news.

The four winners subsequently decided to retain their privacy and anonymity, because obviously such a win garnered very little press coverage over the 13 days in which THE BIGGEST PRIZE IN BRITISH LOTTERY HISTORY wasn’t claimed.

The Mail helpfully informed us that, with their windfall, the lucky winner would be richer than The Bee Gees, Phil Collins – unless you count his wives as assets – and Rod Stewart.

Of course, as four people claimed the collective prize, this statistic was later proven totally irrelevant.

Camelot said in a statement that “as with all major jackpot winners, they will receive independent financial and legal advice as well as ongoing personal support.”

The Buzz-Kill agrees: it must be a real bind to see all those zeros at the end of your bank account.

Camelot rings up winner to offer personal support


Chilling Snowman Theft

This is snow joke

A story broke on the Beeb yesterday about a woman in Kent ringing up the police through an emergency line, complaining that her snowman had been stolen.

She was reported to say that she “haven’t been out to check on him in five hours but when I went out for the fag he was gone.”

Note the word “he”. No ordinary snowman deserves to be personified, no matter what children’s literature and TV shows may tell you.

Perhaps it represents something important to her, she may have painstakingly built it with her estranged son before he got flattened by a snow plough, or perhaps she’s corking mad.

But we think it’s probably because she’s a stingy bitch, mentioning to the police that she believes it requires their involvement as she used pound coins for eyes and teaspoons for arms.

Police told her that it is irresponsible to use an emergency line for small problems like this, saying that “this call may have cost someone’s life”

Initially, we thought this police officer’s reply was quite sensible. That is until we received some leaked telephone transcripts chronicling the abduction of snowmen in a sleepy Kent village…

Here are excerpts from the leaked files:

Transcript 34, 10:24am  A = Police officer Johnson, B = Mrs Flake
A: This is the 999 emergency line, what’s the problem?
B: Hello officer, something…<sounds of sobbing> terrible….
A: Try to calm down madam and explain what’s happened. So we could help.
B: It’s just…. just….. my snowman has been stolen
A: Jesus Christ, this has been the 6th incident today…
B: I’m sorry?
A: I mean sorry madam, but this is not something we should deal with on an emergency hotline, you have wasted our valuable time.

Transcript 63, 11:16am  A = Police officer Johnson, B = Mr Plough, C = Police officer Jackson
B: Hello? Hello? 999? Something bad has happened
A: Sir what seems to be the problem
B: It’s just that this morning I built a fucking brilliant snowman, as high as a lampost he was…
C: (sat beside A, heard whispering on the phoneline) Bullshit…
B:… he was taken away!
A: You’ve got to be kidding me
C: …those sick bastards are at it again!
A: I know…… I mean sir, you’re wasting our time!
B:…. Sir?…..Hello?

Transcript 65, 14:03pm  A = Police officer Johnson, B = Mrs. Smith
B: Hello, 999?
A: Yes, what’s the problem?
B: Somebody’s stolen my snowman!
A: (sighs) Did you get a good look at whoever nicked it?
B: Yes, I think so.
(pause)
A: What did he look like?
B: Well, buttons for eyes, a carrot nose, and twigs for arms…
A: No, I meant the thief, not the bloody snowman!
B: That was the thief, officer.
(X-files theme tune plays in background)


The Blue Man Group never liked playing in Winter. Image c/o the Myspace Snowman Thief

Transcript 94, 14:14pm  A = Police officer Johnson, B = Mrs. Thomas
A: Hello, you’re speaking to officer Johnson, how may I be of assistance?
B: You won’t believe this, but…
A: Somebody’s stolen your snowman too?
B: No, somebody’s been into my house and stolen my copy of The Snowman on CD!
A: Which one are we talking about?
B: The one with a young Aled Jones in it.
A: Well, perhaps it’s for the best, madam.

Transcript 107, 16:35pm  A = Police officer Johnson, B = Mrs Johnson
B: Hello, is officer Johnson speak..
A: Look, if it’s about a snowman theft then WE ARE WORKING ON IT AS HARD AS WE…
B: No, dear it’s me. I just wanted to tell you the dog’s pissed on your side of the bed again.
A: Fucking hell

Transcript 117, 17:06pm  A = Police officer ‘hung like a horse’ Johnson, B = Mrs Taylor
A: Hello, officer Johnson.
B: Hello, I’d like to report a snowman theft.
A: Not you too? We really ought to be looking into this. What happened?
B: Well it was quite the most bizarre thing. The children and I made him this morning, we went out for the day to Bognor Regis, it was lovely actually, the sun came out and we all had a great day. Then we’ve just come back and he’s gone! The kids are very upset.
A: Well, what’s there now?
B: Well it’s strange, his scarf and hat is still there, as are his nose and mouth, but the rest of him has gone…it was awfully wet when we picked them up though.
A: (sighs) Do you not think, madam, that it had anything to do with the Sun?
B: No, we read the Mirror in our house. Well, hubby does it for the Sudoku, you see…
A: Right that’s it, I’m getting out of here

Do you wanna play a little game?

Transcript 135 19:59  A = Angry officer Johnson, B = ?
A: This is my last call so make it quick, you useless..
B: Hello, officer Johnson.
A: Hey how do you know my name?
B: I know many things ab…
A: Is that you Derrick? How’s it going mate?
B: Wait? What? NO. Officer….. I know something about the snowman thief…. you could say.. I AM THE THIEF
A: There’s no need to shout, what are you stealing them for?
B: (maniacal laughter) But that’s for you to find out. In a safe within the abandoned warehouse near the station, you will find…
A: Fuck this, it’s 8 o’clock and i’m ready to clock out, bye.



Want to know what happened to the snowman thief or the snowmen? Find out by emailing us*. To find out more of the brilliant Myspace snowman thief, visit his page here.

*no replies nor acknowledgments guaranteed


Haye vs Harrison As Portrayed In An Episode Of Rainbow

Let’s be clear about one thing: the fight on Saturday was a total anti-climax.

More importantly, it meant that most people couldn’t be bothered to stay up for Pacquiao-Margarito around five hours later, which was an absolute ripper of a fight from start to finish.

Infact, the supposed ‘Battle of Britain’ was such poor fare to render it near farcical; derisory perhaps in its absurdity. Some could even say it was a childish spectacle.

Well for those who agree, the Buzz Kill has found something which truly adds up (Ed: about time, too). A long lost episode guide from erstwhile children’s favourite Rainbow fell into our hands, and suddenly it all makes sense…

Characters: Zippy (David Haye); Bungle (Audley Harrison); George (Adam Booth); Geoffrey (Various news agencies…)

Copyright Press Association

Copyright Thames Television

Episode Title: Follower Of Fashion

Synopsis: Zippy and Bungle have had a disagreement and fallen out. They used to be friends, but they’re not anymore.

Zippy got a belt 12 months ago which he likes very much, but Bungle isn’t happy with Zippy’s new fashion. He wants Zippy’s belt for his own.

Geoffrey reminds Bungle that Zippy got his belt fair and square when he travelled over to Germany to take part in the circus.

But Bungle isn’t happy, and he challenges Zippy to a showdown for his belt.

Geoffrey tells Zippy that, while it doesn’t seem that Bungle should have a chance to take his belt off him, under the jurisdiction of the BBBC he’s allowed to challenge.

Word gets around and soon everybody wanted to know what was going on.

Zippy went off with George to his room, while Bungle went off to his room to prepare for the showdown.

Bungle tells Zippy that because he got a very valuable piece of gold ten years ago, Zippy should be worried. But Zippy wasn’t.

Zippy’s loud mouth often gets him into trouble, and he made Bungle very upset by saying that his hatred of Bungle has helped him prior to the showdown for his belt.

Now ‘hatred’ is a very strong word and should never be used off hand. Only grown-ups should use this word, because it’s far different than saying you don’t like something, for instance.

But Bungle was a good boy; he didn’t shout, or get upset; he said back that he wanted to teach the meaning of love to Zippy, albeit in a roundabout way.

Love is much better and stronger than hate, children.

Geoffrey tells a bedtime story called ‘The Tale of the Tape’, where the moral is that size may count for a lot sometimes, but not all the time. George especially likes this story and says a little rhyme afterwards. (Courtesy East Side Boxing).

After the story was over and everyone had gone to bed, it was ready for the big day in Manchester.

Lots of people had paid very good money to see what was going to happen between Zippy and Bungle, but in the end it only lasted eight minutes, and Zippy got his belt back.

George tells Geoffrey that he thought Zippy would win all along and that he might want to get some more belts next year.

Bungle learned from this that size isn’t all important, as well as realising that Zippy deserved to keep his belt anyway, and that he didn’t deserve such a big belt himself.

Or did he? Does the story go on…for the sake of Audley Harrison, let’s hope not.